Friday, 20 December 2013

TANGLED MESS -SPEEDY DISPOSAL OF CASES IN INDIA

THE TANGLED MESS  
SPEEDY DISPOSAL OF CASES IN INDIA 


Law is the most vital instrument of social transformation which needs to be dispensed effectively. Indian courts are notorious for their inordinate delay in disposing cases, even though the country’s legal system works on the fundamental principle – “Justice delayed is justice denied”.

The right to speedy trail is considered as a constitutional right and is clearly recognized by the apex court in 1979’s famous Hussainara Khatoon case. Even after years of this verdict, we are still debating on the importance of speedy trail and delay in the justice delivery system, which itself is quite appalling. 

India is fast emerging as one of the budding superpowers of the millennia. So a radical transformation in the judicial system becomes inevitable. Lately foreign investors have identified India as the new economic hub and are coming to India to bud their new ventures and to amplify their existing businesses.  It is during this time strict compliance and red-tapism upsurges. These investors may be dared to confront numerous legal issues for which the only legitimate resolution can be through judicial intervention. The delay in disposing off such cases may dishearten the investors and may reconsider his plans for further investments. This is one of the reasons as to how we lose prospective investments in our country. The only sustainable solution is to improve our current legal system.

As per the latest records, there are more than 30 million cases waiting to be disposed off throughout the country, in which over 70,000 pending matters are piled up in the apex court. By this we can see that our courts are overloaded with colossal number of cases and are struggling to prioritize the cases whereby justice is not delayed to the needy. But in practice this approach is very difficult to implement.  If the cases are disposed on a priority basis, natural justice principle will be violated to the person who first approached the courts, seeking justice. Here the question arises as to who decides the priority. An individual’s own case may be his prime priority but it should not be left unattended for the sole reason that it has got less social significance, or that there are more important cases which directly affect the social and economic development of the country. When one cannot get a remedy which is so critical to him in a timely way, it lessens his confidence in the judicial system. Besides judiciary is considered as the last resort of the common man, and to instil confidence, the justice delivery system should deliver in a timely and efficient manner.

When considering criminal cases, delays are common and condition is further disgraceful. Inordinate delay in disposing criminal cases may lead to detaining the accused in jail without trail. According to the most recent reports there are approximately 240,000 under trail prisoners in the country. These numbers reflect a wicked image of our great democratic republic. 

On the other hand criminal activities are on the rise. Terrorism and Sex Crimes have evolved as the biggest social threats.  For such matters unbiased penance and timely disposal is highly vital so as to proclaim the message that gruesome criminal acts will be suppressed instantly. The swift judgements in the Mumbai blast case and Delhi Gang Rape case had lighten the way.

The government is duty bound to take firm action on a fast-track basis to unscramble this pathetic condition. This can be done only through setting up new courts and appointing adequate judicial staff to speed up the justice delivery system. Even when the government is funding infrastructure and encouraging new ventures, it has to ensure that our courts are properly financed to deliver justice to the deprived. They must realise that the key to a better society is not shopping malls or high tech cities but peace and harmony. 

At this Juncture the following words of  Justice Brennan has become ever more significant.

"Nothing rankles more in the human heart than a brooding sense of injustice.

Illness we can put up with. But injustice makes us want to pull things down”

By Adv.Mathew Abraham & Adv. Nikhil George, NEXT MAXIM LEGAL CONSULTANTS